2017年2月28日 星期二

105-02-Week 2: President Obama and Cuban President Clash on Political Prisoners in Cuba


In a joint press conference following meetings in Havana today, President Barack Obama and Cuban President Raúl Castro clashed on the issue of human rights in Cuba.
When Obama raised his objection to arbitrary imprisonments of Cuban dissidents, a practice that human rights groups cite as a major hurdle to the freedom of expression in Cuba, Castro denied that his country has any political prisoners.
"I’ve met with people who have been subject to arbitrary detention and that’s something that I generally have to speak on because I hear from them directly and I know what it means for them," Obama said, in answering a question from Cuban-American reporter Jim Acosta about the state of human rights in Cuba.
Castro grew agitated in responding to the question after Obama, denying knowledge of any political prisoners in Cuba.
"What political prisoners? Give me a name, or names, or after this meeting is over you can give me a list of political prisoners and if we have those political prisoners they will be released before tonight ends," said Castro.
While areas of disagreement between the two leaders was on full display, so too were the signs of progress. Marking the first trip to Cuba by a sitting U.S. president in nearly 90 years, Obama began the news conference by heralding a “new day” in U.S.-Cuba relations.
“For more than half a century, the sight of a U.S. president here in Havana would have been unimaginable. But this is a new day. Es una nueva dia,” Obama said in remarks to reporters at the presidential palace in Cuba.
Castro, in his statement, said that Cuba and the U.S. have achieved “good results” since the reestablishment of bilateral relations, but that that the “positive” steps that have been taken remain “insufficient” due to the continuation of the trade embargo that remains intact and would require an act of Congress to remove.
Castro also called for the return of the territory occupied by the U.S. at Guantanamo Bay, which he said is “illegally occupied.”
Castro welcomed Obama to the Palace of the Revolution for meetings this morning after the American president visited the memorial honoring Cuban independence hero José Martí.
Obama is in the midst of a two-day trip to the island nation that marks the first visit by a sitting U.S. president in nearly 90 years and comes after the two countries reestablished a bilateral relationship in December 2014 following more than five decades of severed relations.


source: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-heralds-day-us-cuban-relations/story?id=37755816

conference會議,大會;討論會,協商會
imprisonment非法拘禁,非法拘留
arbitrary任意的;隨機的;隨心所欲的
 herald預示…的開始;(尤指透過慶祝或讚揚)宣佈(常指好事)
deny否認,否定
insufficient不夠的,不足的;不充分的




105-02-Week 1: Global leaders warn Aung San Suu Kyi over Rohingya



More than a dozen Nobel laureates have criticised Myanmar leader Aung San Suu Kyi for failing to uphold the human rights of Rohingya Muslims in the country's Rakhine state, urging for immediate action to avoid "ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity".
In an open letter to the United Nations Security Council late Thursday, 23 global icons, including 13 laureates and 10 global leaders, expressed their disappointment at what they see as state counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi's failure to ensure Rohingya rights.
"Despite repeated appeals to Aung San Suu Kyi, we are frustrated that she has not taken any initiative to ensure full and equal citizenship rights of the Rohingya," the letter, with signatories including Desmond Tutu and Shirin Ebadi, said.
"Ms Suu Kyi is the leader and is the one with the primary responsibility to lead, and lead with courage, humanity and compassion," it said.
The violence had the hallmarks of Rwanda's 1994 genocide, as well as ethnic cleansing in Sudan's western Darfur region, Bosnia and Kosovo, said the letter.
In recent weeks, more than 27,000 people belonging to the persecuted Muslim minority, a group loathed by many of Myanmar's Buddhist majority, have fled a Burmese military operation in Rakhine state launched in response to the attack of border posts by armed groups.
At least 86 people have been killed in the crackdown launched after attacks on police posts near the border with Bangladesh on October 9.
Rohingya survivors say they suffered rape, murder and arson at the hands of soldiers, accounts that have raised global alarm and galvanised protests around Southeast Asia.
Azeem Ibrahim, of the Center for Global Policy, a US-based think tank, told Al Jazeera this was the first time a Nobel Peace laureate had been denounced by such a large number of fellow laureates.
"This is an unprecedented letter. Never have we seen one Nobel laureate being condemned by so many other laureates," he said.
"I think this letter was born out of the frustration of activists around the world with Aung San Suu Kyi's inability to get a handle on the situation despite the many opportunities afforded to her.
"This is not the first time such a letter has been issued. In May of last year, we saw seven Nobel laureates accusing Aung San Suu Kyi of actually presiding over a genocide."



source: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/12/urged-rohingya-human-crisis-161230202804249.html

laureate諾貝爾獎得獎者
immediate立即的,立刻的
counsellor顧問;諮詢師;輔導員
initiative倡議;新措施
signatory簽約者;締約國
galvanise激起;使震驚,使振奮
persecute(因種族、宗教、政治理念)迫害;虐待;煩擾,糾纏
denounce(公開)譴責,痛斥
afford提供;給予
genocide(尤指對整個民族、種族或宗教團體的)大屠殺,種族滅絶






2017年1月10日 星期二

WEEK 8: EU referendum debate

EU referendum debate: Who won at Wembley?



abour's Mayor of London Sadiq Khan and Scottish Conservatives leader Ruth Davidson became unlikely bedfellows last night to lead the Remain charge against Boris Johnson during the latest TV debate on the EU referendum.
With less than 36 hours to go before polling opens, the atmosphere was "tetchy", says The Guardian, and there was no shortage of raised voices.A six-strong line up – Khan, Davidson and Johnson were joined by Labour MP Gisela Stuart, energy minister Andrea Leadsom and TUC general secretary Frances O'Grady - argued the issues in front of 6,000 people at Wembley Arena, the biggest televised debate on the subject so far.
As feared by some in the Remain camp, Johnson seized upon Labour leader's Jeremy Corbyn's recent candid comments on immigration limits.
"Jeremy Corbyn – he's the leader – he said there was no way of controlling immigration in the EU," said the former London mayor, to laughter and applause.
The In faction wasn't alone in being haunted by a careless misstep, however. Khan got the line of the night by flipping Leave's repeated dismissal of the Remain argument as "Project Fear" to create his own buzzword.
"Your campaign hasn’t been Project Fear, it’s been Project Hate as far as immigration is concerned," he declared, to applause. Out came the now infamous Vote Leave posters, one of which warned voters of an imminent Turkish accession to the EU, which Khan decried as a "big fat lie".
Davidson was quick off the mark to attack another Vote Leave talking point. Johnson and his colleagues had urged UK voters to "take back control", she said, adding: "You lose control by losing your seat at the table."
A rising star in Scottish politics, Davidson's performance "attracted praise from Remain supporters across the political spectrum, and even from within the Leave campaign", adds the Guardian.
Despite their lack of TV polish alongside veteran spotlight-stealer Johnson, says John Rentoul in The Independent, Davidson and Khan came off best.
However, the substance of the debate itself was unlikely to change many minds.
"The principals mainly traded soundbites to enthusiastic cheers and applause from their side’s supporters, while the other side heckled and tried to interrupt," he writes.
So great was their enthusiasm, the Wembley Arena audience threatened to drown out the debate with "whooping, cheering and groaning", says Michael Deacon in the Daily Telegraph. "By the end, every halfway coherent answer was being met with deafening acclaim."

http://www.theweek.co.uk/brexit/72458/eu-referendum-debate-who-won-at-wembley

WHO: abour's Mayor of London Sadiq Khan and Scottish Conservatives leader
WHAT: EU referendum debate
WHERE: EU
WHEN: 2016/6/10
bedfellows (n.) a person connected with another in a particular activity
referendum (n.) a vote in which all the people in a country or an area are asked to give their opinion about or decide an important political or social question
tetchy (adj.) easily made angry, unhappy, or upset
dismissal (n.) the situation in which an employer officially makes someone leave their job
groan (n.)  a deep, long sound showing great pain or unhappiness
coherent (adj.)  If an argument, set of ideas, or a plan is coherent, it is clear and carefully considered, and each part of it connects or follows in a natural or reasonable way.
applause (n.) the sound of people clapping their hands repeatedly to show enjoyment or approval of something such as a performance or speech
soundbites (n.) a short sentence or phrase that is easy to remember, often included in a speech made by a politician and repeated in newspapers and on television and radio

WEEK 7: White Helmets

As the war worsens, rescue workers risk their lives on the front lines
BY JARED MALSIN / GAZIANTEP, TURKEY | PHOTOGRAPHS BY MOHAMMED BADRA
In Syria, it’s been all too easy to lose the plot. Things began simply enough, another promising bud in the Arab Spring—­ordinary citizens marching peacefully against a Middle Eastern despot.
It was a heart-­lifting display, maybe a bit tardy after the movements in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen and Libya, but you certainly knew whom to cheer for. The good guys were in plain sight, chanting “Freedom” and “Peace” from orderly rows. Until the government forces opened fire.
But as the crowds scattered for cover and, before long, took up arms themselves, what steadily enveloped the conflict was not so much the fog of war as its miasma. Opposition to the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad shattered into more than 1,000 armed groups. The most successful gathered under the banner of jihadism, either al-Qaeda or eventually ISIS, its even more repugnant spin-off. There’s nothing to like there. Then the neighbors started in, sending guns or money or troops—Iran, Russia, Hizballah, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and finally the U.S.
All wars produce ­confusion—for chaos, nothing else comes close—but even the most brutal contests produce a glimmer of hope, or at least some sense of what is driving people to put their lives on the line. Yet to outsiders, 5½ years of revolution and war in Syria might appear to have produced mostly villains, along with refugees and numbing images of suffering on a blasted landscape that recalls Stalingrad.
http://time.com/syria-white-helmets/

WHO: White Helmets
WHAT: save people from wars
WHERE: Syria
WHEN: every moment when there is a war 
WHY: save people



repugnant (adj.) If behavior or beliefs, etc. are repugnant, they are very unpleasant, causing a feeling of disgust.

orderly (n.) a hospital worker who does jobs for which no training is 

steadily (adv.) gradually

beneath (prep.) in or to a lower position than someone or something, under someone or something

glimmer (v.) to shine with a weak light or a light that is not continuous

blast (v.) to explode or destroy something or someone with explosives, or to break through or hit something with a similar, very strong force

tardy (adj.) slow or late in happening or arriving




WEEK 6: SpaceX



The epic rocket landing SpaceX pulled off today (April 8) is a big step forward in humanity's march out into the cosmos, company founder and CEO Elon Musk said.
SpaceX managed to land the first stage of its Falcon 9 rocket on a robotic "drone ship" in the Atlantic Ocean during the successful launch of the company's uncrewed Dragon cargo capsule toward the International Space Station from Florida's Cape Canaveral Air Force Station this afternoon.
The first-of-its-kind touchdown is an important milestone in SpaceX's quest to develop completely reusable rockets, which Musk has said could revolutionize spaceflight by reducing launch costs by a factor of 100.
"I think it's another step toward the stars," Musk said during a post-launch press briefing today. "In order for us to really open up access to space, we've got to achieve full and rapid reusability. And to be able to do that for the primary rocket booster is going to [have] a huge impact on cost."
SpaceX has landed a Falcon 9 first stage once before, bringing the booster back on dry land at Cape Canaveral during a satellite launch this past December. But today's touchdown was the first successful drone-ship landing after four near-misses; similar attempts in January 2015, April 2015, January 2016 and March 2016 ended with the rocket hitting the drone ship but then toppling over and exploding on its deck.
"The rocket landed instead of putting a hole in the ship or tipping over, so we're really excited about that," Musk said today.
SpaceX would ideally like to land all of its rockets on terra firma, because doing so streamlines the testing and reflight processes significantly. But boosters on certain missions cannot carry enough fuel to make it all the way back to land, so it's important to be proficient at ocean landings as well, Musk said.
"About half of our missions will need to land out to sea," he said. "Any missions that are going to, particularly, geostationary orbit or to escape velocity — anything beyond Earth — is likely to need to land on the ship."
If all goes according to plan, the Falcon 9 that touched down today will be hauled back to shore on Sunday (April 8) — the same day Dragon is scheduled to arrive at the space station. The rocket stage will then be fired 10 times in a row on the ground at Cape Canaveral to assess its suitability for reflight, Musk said.
If everything checks out, SpaceX hopes to launch this same Falcon 9 first stage again by June or so, perhaps during an operational orbital mission (one that also lofts a satellite for a paying customer), Musk said. (SpaceX is turning the booster that landed in December into a museum piece, and plans to install it at the company's headquarters in Hawthorne, California in the next few months.)
Eventually, the company aims to refly boosters within a few weeks of touchdown, and to launch the rockets many times before retiring them.
"I think almost everything on the stage will be good for 10 or 20 missions, and, with minor refurbishment, you could get to 100," Musk said.
If SpaceX does achieve that level of reflight, the savings over traditional one-and-done launches will be huge. It costs only $200,000 to $300,000 to refuel a Falcon 9, Musk said, while the rocket itself costs about $60 million.
SpaceX isn't the only entity working to develop reusable rockets. Blue Origin, the company established by Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, has launched and landed the same New Shepard booster three times, with the most recent such test occurring last weekend. But, as Musk likes to point out, New Shepard flies only to suborbital space; the Falcon 9 reaches greater altitudes and speeds on its orbital missions before coming back to Earth.
Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

If all goes according to plan, the Falcon 9 that touched down today will be hauled back to shore on Sunday (April 8) — the same day Dragon is scheduled to arrive at the space station. The rocket stage will then be fired 10 times in a row on the ground at Cape Canaveral to assess its suitability for reflight, Musk said.
If everything checks out, SpaceX hopes to launch this same Falcon 9 first stage again by June or so, perhaps during an operational orbital mission (one that also lofts a satellite for a paying customer), Musk said. (SpaceX is turning the booster that landed in December into a museum piece, and plans to install it at the company's headquarters in Hawthorne, California in the next few months.)
Eventually, the company aims to refly boosters within a few weeks of touchdown, and to launch the rockets many times before retiring them.
"I think almost everything on the stage will be good for 10 or 20 missions, and, with minor refurbishment, you could get to 100," Musk said.
If SpaceX does achieve that level of reflight, the savings over traditional one-and-done launches will be huge. It costs only $200,000 to $300,000 to refuel a Falcon 9, Musk said, while the rocket itself costs about $60 million.
SpaceX isn't the only entity working to develop reusable rockets. Blue Origin, the company established by Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, has launched and landed the same New Shepard booster three times, with the most recent such test occurring last weekend. But, as Musk likes to point out, New Shepard flies only to suborbital space; the Falcon 9 reaches greater altitudes and speeds on its orbital missions before coming back to Earth.
Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+. Follow us @SpacedotcomFacebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

WHO: SpaceX
WHAT: The epic rocket landing SpaceX pulled off
WHERE: outer space
WHEN: 2016/4/8


humanity (n) people in general

revolutionize (v.) to completely change something so that it is much better

satellite (n.) a device sent up into space to travel around the earth, used for collecting information or communicating by radio, television, etc.

primary (adj.) more important than anything else; main

suborbital (n.) the outer parts of a town, where there are houses, but no large shops, places of work, or places of entertainment










WEEK 5: Paris Climate Change Conference

More than 100 climate and development organisations, along with 70,000 people, have called on Barack Obama to help secure the future of the Paris agreement by transferring the remaining $2.5bn committed by the US.
The Green Climate Fund was a key aspect of the historic Paris agreement signed in 2015, which aims to keep global warming “well below” 2C and aspires to keep warming to 1.5C.



The fund, established in 2010, is financed by wealthy countries and used to assistdeveloping countries with adaptation and mitigation. It was widely seen as a key measure to bring both rich and poor countries to the negotiating table.
The US pledged $3bn towards the fund, making up nearly a third of the $10.3bn pledged in total. But so far, it has only transferred $500m.
“This is one of the only things Obama can do now that Trump can’t undo,” said Jesse Bragg from Corporate Accountability International, the group that organised the petitions. “Once those funds are transferred, Trump won’t be able to take them back.”
As of today, 117 organisations including 350.org, Friends of the Earth and the League of Conservation Voters have joined with Corporate Accountability International to deliver a petition signed by more than 70,000 to the Obama administration.



The organisations signed a letter saying: “The world cannot afford Donald Trump’s steps backward on climate. Right now, people around the world are mobilising to counter Trump’s anticipated actions. You can help us protect your climate legacy by fulfilling your pledge to contribute $3bn to fund climate justice measures in the Global South.”
The petition those organisations delivered said: “Donald Trump plans to do everything he can to reverse progress on climate change. His policies threaten disaster for people and the planet. But there’s one thing President Obama can do before he leaves office that Trump cannot undo.”
Trump has nominated a series of climate deniers to his cabinet, including Rex Tillerson, the chief executive of Exxon Mobil, as secretary of state. He has also nominated Scott Pruitt, who is known for suing the Environmental Protection Agency, to direct that agency.
Tamar Lawrence-Samuel, associate research director at Corporate Accountability International, said: “Donald Trump’s administration will be of, by and for the fossil fuel industry and if we don’t act now, millions will suffer.”



“President Obama must do whatever it takes to fulfil the US’s commitment to the Green Climate Fund before Donald Trump and his Big Oil cabinet take over,” she said.
350.org’s founder, Bill McKibben, said: “The debt for the damage inflicted on the global climate by American carbon will never be fully repaid – and the Trump administration can be counted on to do nothing for the most vulnerable people on the planet … so this call makes both practical and moral sense.”
The first $500m was transferred through a State Department fund, which Obama could use without congressional support. Corporate Accountability International argues that Obama could draw from several relevant funds to fulfill his pledge, including those within the State Department, Treasury Department, Defense Department and other agencies.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/dec/21/petition-calls-for-barack-obama-to-fulfil-green-climate-fund-pledge

WHO: More than 100 climate and development organisations
WHAT: Paris Climate Change Conference
WHERE: Paris
WHEN: 2016/12/21
WHY: protect the earth


mitigation (n.) reduction in how harmful, unpleasant, or bad something is.

administration (n.) the arrangements and tasks needed to control the operation of a plan or organization

mobilize (v.) to organize or prepare something, such as a group of people, for a purpose

legacy (n.) money or property that you receive from someone after they die

aim (n.)  a result that your plans or actions are intended to achieve

accountable (adj.) Someone who is accountable is completely responsible for what they do and must be able to give a satisfactory reason for it